tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4123173409120259026.post2678411211382935943..comments2009-12-25T10:27:29.658-05:00Comments on Software Architecture: Software Engineering: Dead?Brian Sondergaardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714290965708039030noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4123173409120259026.post-7685345447791075112009-07-19T21:12:17.583-04:002009-07-19T21:12:17.583-04:00I can see that too. If you look at the recent pro...I can see that too. If you look at the recent product developments microsoft has provided: WPF, WWF, WCF. Its really about assembling some components together; Do not dare try circumventing those components....so the job is really coming more and more about assembling some libraries together and calling it a solution.tatmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07027824529635285617noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4123173409120259026.post-6240258083359571392009-07-19T19:49:20.812-04:002009-07-19T19:49:20.812-04:00DeMarco did not say "Software Engineering is dead"...DeMarco did not say "Software Engineering is dead". Here is the entire quote:<br /><br />QUOTE: I’m gradually coming to the conclusion that software engineering is an idea whose time has come and gone. <i>I still believe it makes excellent sense to engineer software.</i> But that isn’t exactly what software engineering has come to mean.Krishhttp://www.thoughtclusters.comnoreply@blogger.com